Millions

Ever wondered how much Microsoft makes an hour (via)?

Microsoft today announced quarterly revenue of $14.4 billion and net income of $4.93 billion. In other words, Microsoft’s daily net income is about $55 million. That’s $55 million in pure profit every 24 hours. Do some quick math and you’ll learn it takes Microsoft only about…

  • 10 hours or so (yes, hours!) to exceed Red Hat’s quarterly net income of $20.5 million.
  • four days to exceed Research In Motion’s quarterly net income of $187.9 million.
  • four days to exceed Starbucks’ quarterly net income of $205 million.
  • one week to exceed Nike’s quarterly net income of $350.8 million.
  • two weeks to exceed McDonalds’ quarterly net income of $762 million.
  • two weeks to exceed Apple’s quarterly net income of $770 million.
  • 18 days to exceed Google’s quarterly net income of $1 billion.
  • 23 days to exceed Coca-Cola’s quarterly net income of $1.26 billion.
  • five weeks to exceed IBM’s quarterly net income of $1.85 billion.
  • 10 weeks to exceed Wal-Mart’s quarterly net income of $3.9 billion.

Can’t they at least make Vista cheaper?

Google’s Latest

Without resorting to the Doubleclick acquisition that has been  analysed  ad nauseam around the  blogoshere these past few days, there are two things to point out that Google has also done.

The first comes to me via Andy Beal (which comes to me via Scoble).

Google Acquires Video Conferencing Company

There’s just no stopping Google. Seriously, if you’ve bought into the idea that Google is not a threat to your business, it’s time to re-evaluate that position.

Why so? Google has just announced their acquisition of Marratech, a video conferencing and collaboration company, which will now see them compete with the likes of WebEx.

Forgive me, but, how many services does Google have now? Just kidding, but you get my point. Google is diversifying beyond its core business of search. Why is Google doing this? Same reason why Microsoft is poring Billions in to its Home Entertainment Division – Defense In Depth. In addition to that the more diverse the company is the better able it is to survive, kind of like the  Greek Myth of the Hydra .

At the same time, its also returning to its core business of search though this acquisition. Confused? Read this:

Here’s how it works…

  • Works on Mac, Windows and Linux.
  • Runs on existing PC’s and Laptops – no additional capital expenditure.
  • Have a private ‘one-to-one’ conversation with any participant
  • Share any application and hand control to another user.
  • All participants can record and playback the entire net meeting including voice, video and whiteboard.
  • It’s easy to include office group meetings or video conferences in a Marratech video net e-meeting.
  • Call remote people into the video net meeting even if they are away from a computer.
  • It does all this over highspeed broadband internet without the need to use a telephone.
  • End-to-end encryption ensures security for your entire net meeting including voice, video and documents .
  • You can present or ‘broadcast’ to an unlimited audience.
  • Marratech’s licensed Manager works on Mac, Linux, Windows and Solaris servers.
  • Marratech Manager offers quick installation, upgrades and administration features for fast and easy configuration.

Let me just repeat that: All participants can record and playback the entire net meeting including voice, video and whiteboard.

Ahh, its clearer now. Google will have a killer algorithm for searching said recordings. Perhaps Google will provide contextual ads to help the meeting along.  So if you are, say, a construction company looking for a new timber supplier, the appropriate ads show up on the side of the screen.

I must admit, Google is good.

The other bit comes to me via Rex Hammrock ( also via Scoble).

He takes a look at Google Web History (formerly codenamed “Search History” 🙂 ).

The newly renamed service goes beyond chronicling merely what I’ve “searched” for via Google, but now maintains a history of every site I visit — complete with a time-stamp of when I visited. And, perhaps the most significant feature of all — if it truly exists — is speculated by Gary Price: that Google is caching a version of the page you visited, so that when you search across your history, you can find the site as it was when you visited. Yes, that is truly amazing, if it works, and is a feature that could make one overlook all of the creepiness of being shown the reality of everything Google knows about you when you use one service for searching, mapping, comparing products, sending email, and then, embed a tool of theirs in your web browser.

This now takes what we say and do on the web to a new level. What ever we write, will still be there in 100 years time – erasing it is not possible. Now what we do is in the same category.

Now you could argue that there are legitimate applications for this – i.e. policing employee behavior, in investigative police work and so on. But on the whole, its worrying. I can can also see parents demanding that this be turned on for their kids.

I would find it helpful to hear from some of the folks associated with AttentionTrust.org, as this type of data — and the belief that we, as users, “own” this data — is their focus. While I can see how to activate, pause, edit or delete the data stored in my “Web History,” I haven’t seen yet if I can “export” the information. If a user can export such data, it becomes more than a “feature,” it becomes the basis of an economy where I can exchange such data about myself for something of tangible value beyond the transaction I have engaged in with Google by exchanging my attention for the value I derive from the efficiency and productivity they provide me through such a service. If I can export that attention data, not only will Google be rewarded for knowing exactly what type of car I am shopping for at the moment, I will also be able to benefit from it in the marketplace.

Something about all of this makes me think of a song by Police.

Every move you make
Every breath you take
Every bond you break
Every step you take
Ill be watching you

If you’re interested, SearchEngineLand.com has a nice writeup of Web History

Anil Dash  (also via Scoble) has this to say:

From a technical standpoint, Google Web History is one of those tools that’s so well-executed it seems simple, or even obvious, the first time you see it. There’s a basic timeline of your search history, with the ability to drill into specific search result histories for Google properties like web search, image search, news, Froogle (now renamed Google Product Search, though the UI for Web History shows the old name), Video, and Maps. There’s even, astoundingly, a history of which AdSense Ads you’ve clicked on.

So Google, not content with merely searching the web, now enables us to search our own online lives.

All ideas in this post Copyright (C) 2007 Roberto Bonini All Rights Reserved

Windows Home Server, part 5: The Re-Install

So far so good. Setup is proceeding normally. I’ hitting the knees every five minutes praying that all goes to plan.

I’m told that installation will take approximately 51 minutes. And, if memory serves, that’s longer than for the Beta 2 install.

For the sake of convenience the server is not connected to the network as its easier to take the server to the screen and keyboard rather than the other way around ( yeah, I know!)

I’ll update this post after the “Finalizing Installation” box is ticked

Update: The Re-Install was a completel disaster. It stopped after rebooting once.There are no shared folders – nothing. I’m trying again. Hopefully its work this time.

Update 2: The install wizard only give the new installation option now. Hmm. The file and folders show up fine, but can’t be opened. I’ve remove the primary hd and hooked it up to my work machine and am running DiskInternals NTFS Recovery 1.5 on it. Its only my second time using it, and the fist time I’m really putting it though it throught its paces. If it recovers my data, I’m buying the full license. The funny thing is that this only happens one the primary HD. The duplicrtes onthe other two HD’s are fine. Very strange. So If i have to re-install, I’ll only be losing part of my data. I’ll let you know how recovery goes.

Oh, The Joy!!! – WHS CTP

Just reading my feeds and was pleasantly surprised to find that a new Community Technology Preview was out for Windows Home Server. I’m downloading it now. Depending on the state of sanity of my Internet connection ( 🙂 ) it should take about 3 hours.

Can’t wait to get my hands on this. I just might be up late tonight…

This could not have come at a better time  as I just added a 400Gb hard drive.

And yes, I will copy everything off before the upgrade. I’m not in a the mood to burn 2000 tracks again.

I just wonder how close this CTP will be to the release version. Which leads me to ask: Will there be a Release Candidate? 

Windows Home Server and SQL Server

I tried again today to install SQL Server 2005 on WHS. All the other components installed except for the actual Server, the Native Client and the Vss Writer ( what ever its actually called). To get this far you need to work around the SSL issue on WHS, which hopefully will be solved by the time it ships.

This KB article helped alot, even though its for SQL 2000.

To install SQL Server 2000 successfully, export the certificates to a file, and then delete the certificates from the Certificate MMC snap-in. After you successfully install SQL Server 2000:

1.Stop the SQL Server service.

2.Reinstall your certificates.

3.Start the SQL Server service.

There’s a KB article on exporting and installing certificates here.

With just a small caveat. WHS will automatically repopulate the Certificates in Personal/Certificates folder. You need to make sure that the imported certificate is the only one in there, which means you delete the new one. if you don’t do this the Remote Website will not work. I’ve no idea why.

So I’m going to hunt for the SQL Install log and see if I can find a workaround for what ever went wrong.