Yep. I’m writing this from my Windows 7 VM (on Virtual PC 2007 SP2).
Performance wise, The setup inside of the Vm is making it sluggish. But of the gig of RAM its got, its only using 32%. Which is notable. Vista beta 2, on the other hand) on the same machine in a dual boot configuration used up 80% (of one gig of RAM) standing still.
Talking of performance, I’ve backed the VM up to Windows Home Server. It took all of 20 minutes. Which frankly surprised me. given the fact that this was a new OS running under a VM.
So I’m inclined to wonder exactly how similar to Vista is 7, file wise? Since WHS only copies to the server files which it does not have a copy of (or a version of). Or, it could be that 7 is optimised for WHS to backup (Which makes sense on a number of levels, but not to the European Union).
The other thing i notice is the new taskbar. I’ve grown used to the Vista taskbar for some reason or other, but this is a pleasant change. The fact that the task bar items can be configured to show application names or not, is really neat.
They do, however get confused with the buttons in the Quick Launch bar quite easily.
The UAC logo has changed colour, to yellow and blue, in keeping with the OS colour scheme. The UAC prompts themselves are worded differently.
The absence of a sidebar is nice. And I hope that the performance hit that running Sidebar produced is gone too. Gadgets are still there, just in the background and way less conspicuous.
Its quite a please feel to the whole OS. Does it feel like Vista?? A little. Its familiar territory. But In truth, I’ve yet to explorer the OS thoroughly. So that answer will have to wait.
One thing that is defiantly different is that Google Chrome 1.0 looks different.its a dark Blue instead of alight blue.
Talking of web browsers, i decided to install IE8. Which didn’t install. It didn’t recognize the OS for some strange reason. Must try again cause I hear that a few people have managed to do it.
I must say that I’m impressed enough to be considering upgrading one of my Vista machines to Windows 7.
This Beta 1 makes me look to Beta 2 and Release with a lot of hope that Microsoft have learned their lesson of the Vista Release debacle.
The one thing that no ones said anything much about is the WinFS file system that Vista was supposed to ship.
With Sun’s ZFS redundant file system, Microsoft are lagging behind. Even OSX has ZFS built in ( it has to be enabled with some obscure command line tricks, but its there).
Even if Microsoft released a separate beta version with WinFS, I’d be happy.
NTFS is old. Time to innovate it.
2 thoughts on “Windows 7”
What is wrong with NTFS? Only its age or there is something you are missing?
I just that think that NTFS can be improved upon. WINFS looks good and we’ve been waiting for it for a while.
ZFS is a great example of what a modern filesystem can accomplish.
This is not one of those “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” issues.
I just thought of this now, but WHS itself improves on NTFS with its drive replication and storage pool technology.
How difficult would it be for Windows 7 to borrow it??
Comments are closed.